Plagiarism in the research and publication ethics is defined regardless of the intention or the character of the perpetrators. Recognition of and respect to the intellectual rights of ownership which is the base of the research and publication ethics depend on two large conceptual developments which are correlated: the development of erudition to the academic work; and the development of knowledge to academic goods. In the present paper, the author focuses on the technological aspect of the research and publication institute and its correlated ethics. Regarding this, he, first of all, writes an introduction to the technology in general, the research and publication institute in particular, and the ethics of dealing with them. Then, he presents some issues regarding the ethics of research and publication, and sets forth his arguments about the necessity of return to the ethics of research and publication.
Mahdi Mojāhedi, M. (2014). From the False Dilemma of “Standard” and “Ideal” to the Dead End of “Sociality”. The Quarterly Journal Ayeneh-ye- Pazhoohesh, 25(145), 5-15.
MLA
Muhammad Mahdi Mojāhedi. "From the False Dilemma of “Standard” and “Ideal” to the Dead End of “Sociality”", The Quarterly Journal Ayeneh-ye- Pazhoohesh, 25, 145, 2014, 5-15.
HARVARD
Mahdi Mojāhedi, M. (2014). 'From the False Dilemma of “Standard” and “Ideal” to the Dead End of “Sociality”', The Quarterly Journal Ayeneh-ye- Pazhoohesh, 25(145), pp. 5-15.
VANCOUVER
Mahdi Mojāhedi, M. From the False Dilemma of “Standard” and “Ideal” to the Dead End of “Sociality”. The Quarterly Journal Ayeneh-ye- Pazhoohesh, 2014; 25(145): 5-15.